Police officer in Karen Read murder trial tests his SUV in reverse as juror is dismissed

DEDHAM – The Karen Read The murder trial resumed Friday in Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., with more testimony from prosecution witnesses as the seventh week of the trial concludes.

Read is accused of hitting and killing her boyfriend, 46-year-old Boston police officer John O’Keefe, with his SUV after a night of drinking. January 29, 2022. She was dropping him off at a house party when, prosecutors say, she hit him with her Lexus SUV as he made a three-point turn and drove off, leaving him to die in a snowstorm. The house where the party took place, 34 Fairview Road in Canton, was owned at the time by former Boston police officer Brian Albert.

Read has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder and several other charges. His lawyers claim that Read was framed and that O’Keefe was killed in a fight inside the house and that his body was dragged outside and left in the storm.

Google search on how long to die in the cold

Jessica Hyde, a digital forensics expert, was the first witness to take the stand Friday. She works for a company in upstate New York called Hexordia that specializes in digital forensics training.

The prosecution and defense asked Hyde to review time stamps and review Google searches made by Jennifer McCabe.

Earlier in the trial, McCabe, who was with Read as they searched for O’Keefe in the snowstorm, was asked about a Google search she had done that morning. She said Read asked her to check how long it would take for someone to freeze to death after finding O’Keefe’s body.

The prosecution said the searches were carried out at 6:23 a.m. and 6:24 a.m. on January 29, 2022. The defense said the timestamp was actually 2:27 a.m., a few hours before O’Keefe was found .

Hyde told the court Friday that 2:27 a.m. could be the time the search tab was initially opened or moved. She said the last search of McCabe’s phone was at 6:24 a.m.

“The very peculiar thing to know about this timestamp is that it is not necessarily the time of the search,” she told the court. “I see no evidence that the term was searched before 6:24 a.m..”

During a brief cross-examination, Read’s attorney, David Yannetti, asked Hyde if she could rule out that the phone’s owner did a Google search at 2:27 a.m. Hyde said she couldn’t “rule out something that doesn’t exist,” adding that’s like asking if there was a search for “pandas,” of which there is no proof.

Accident reconstructionist says Read’s SUV reversed in front of 34 Fairview Road

After Hyde finished his testimony, Massachusetts State Trooper Joe Paul took the stand.

He is a rebuilder and described how the testing process works. He said two acceleration and deceleration tests were performed on Read’s SUV. He added that there was no data on airbag deployment, which Paul said is not unusual in a pedestrian accident.

From data collected from a server inside the SUV, it shows that it drove, then reversed, at the time the SUV was in front of 34 Fairview Road, according to Paul. During the triggering event detected by the SUV’s Toyota Techstream software, the SUV slowed to zero and then to 24.2 miles per hour, traveling 62.5 feet.

“It starts in gear, it slows down to zero, and it goes to zero, which is neutral, and then it goes into reverse,” Paul described. “So it goes straight, it stops, then it goes into reverse and then it goes in reverse.” Paul said the SUV was reversing in a straight line and going about 24.2 miles per hour.

“There’s a point there where it seems to correspond to a pedestrian strike,” Paul said, referring to the sudden change in speed. Paul added that O’Keefe’s injuries were also consistent with a pedestrian strike.

A video was shown to the jury of Paul testing Read’s SUV, showing his rear-view and 360-degree cameras were both working.

What happened to the live broadcast of the Karen Read trial?

Testimony was delayed earlier in the day by more than an hour Friday when the camera on the streaming video feed accidentally captured a photo of a juror entering the courtroom for a sidebar with Judge Beverly Cannone. The photographer quickly moved the camera away, but a few minutes later Cannone ordered it turned off for the rest of the morning.

In the absence of a video feed of the trial, a Zoom feed was provided by the court until the end of morning recess. Just after noon, Cannone allowed the regular video feed to resume.

Karen Read junior rejected

Before testimony began Friday, Cannone met with four jurors individually in boxes. We don’t know what was discussed. Subsequently, the judge declared that, for sufficient reasons, one of those jurors had been dismissed.

“It’s personal for this juror,” Cannone told the courtroom.

There are now 15 juniors – 9 women and 6 men. Another junior was officially rejected earlier this week, Wednesday.

When asked if the trial would still end as scheduled despite all the delays, defense attorney Yannetti responded, “I think the prosecutor indicated he would rest by Thursday.” »

Will Karen Read testify?

WBZ-TV’s Kristina Rex asked Read Thursday afternoon if she was going to testify.

“Whatever the lawyers say I have to do, I’ll do it and I’m willing to go either way,” Read said.

Karen Read trial schedule

Full days of testimony are scheduled for next week, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and a half-day Friday. The courthouse will be closed Wednesday for the June 19 vacation.

Read’s lawyers told Rex they had obtained information that prosecutors would rest their case on Tuesday.

The defense told WBZ-TV earlier this month They plan to take four full days to present their case to the jury.

Judge Cannone told the jury last week that she “can safely assert that you will receive this matter for your deliberation during the last week of June.”

What is the latest news on the Karen Read trial?

Thursday, the jury heard about the DNA evidence and saw data from Read’s phone the night O’Keefe died.

Three forensic experts tested that O’Keefe likely matched DNA found on a broken taillight from Read’s SUV and broken glass found next to his body. A hair pulled from the SUV by a medical examiner was also a likely match.

Read’s attorneys did not cross-examine any of the expert witnesses Thursday. They claim O’Keefe’s DNA was implanted. They also allege that the lead investigator, Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor, tampered with the taillight of his SUV. Proctor’s DNA was tested and experts verified Thursday that it was not found on Read’s taillight.

An evidence photo of the broken red tail light on the passenger side of Karen Read’s SUV.

Norfolk Superior Court


The jury also heard from Massachusetts State Police Lt. Brian Tully. He traced Karen Read’s steps that night and morning through a combination of surveillance video and cell tower tracking.

Who is Karen Read?

Karen Read, 44, is from Mansfield, Massachusetts. She was dating Boston police officer John O’Keefe at the time of her death. After dropping him off at the Canton house party early on the morning of January 29, 2022, she drove to O’Keefe’s house. When O’Keefe didn’t come home that morning and couldn’t reach him, Read and two other women went out looking for her. O’Keefe was found dead, covered in snow around 6 a.m.

First responders at the scene were later tested and heard Read say, “I hit him.”

His trial was initially expected to last 6 to 8 weeks.

Leave a Comment